CHASE

Manuscript Annotations

Page No.	Note
2	In 8942 dolce added here.	View
2	V removed and slur beginning moved to this note in 8942.	View
2	In 8942 David's slurred staccato on i-ii has been removed and a slur added on x-xi; vii-vii have been fingered 4 0.	View
2	In 8942 the dots on i and ii have been replaced by a slur and David's slurred staccato removed.	View
2	Fingered 4 3 in 8942 (merely making David's intended fingering explicit).	View
2	Fingered 2 in 8942.	View
2	Fingered 2 in 8942.	View
3	Horizontal lines and a slur have been added in 8942.	View
3	Horizontal lines under the slur have been added in 8942.	View
3	A V has been added in 8942.	View
3	Not in 8942. Probably omitted in error.	View
3	Not in 8942.	View
3	The dots here and in the next bar have been replaced by lines in 8942.	View
3	All dots have been replaced by lines in 8942.	View
3	Dots replaced by lines in 8942.	View
3	Dots replaced by lines in 8942.	View
3	Fingered 2 in 8942.	View
3	In 8942 dolce added here.	View
3	Fingered 2 in 8942. The passage from the last added fingering to here was perhaps intended to be played in 1st position by David, although in view of the fingering on the next stave, which indicates that the player was expected to be in 3rd position at that stage, it seems more likely that an intended fingering was omitted here through oversight.	View
3	Horizontal lines added on all these crotchets and a V on the last one in 8942.	View
3	Fingered 2 in 8942.	View
4	David's 2nd position fingering removed and replaced by a shift to 1 in 3rd position on iv.	View
4	Fingered 1 in 8942.	View
4	Not in 8942, but evidently intended there.	View
4	Fingered 1 on iv and 4 4 on viii-ix in8942.	View
4	Fingered 2 in 8942.	View
4	Dots replaced by lines in 8942.	View
4	Additional slurs on i-iii and v-vii added under bowing slur in 8942.	View
4	David's slurred staccato has been replaced by a slur on i-ii in 8942.	View
4	David's slurred staccato has been replaced by a normal slur on i-ii in 8942.	View
4	Fingered 2 in 8942 (obviously intended here too).	View
5	Changed to Π in 8942, requiring a retake of the bow, whereas here David envisaged a sf attack at the point, a typical feature of his style. Curiously, the equivalent passage in the exposition was not changed in 8942.	View
5	Here and in the next bar the portato is treated in the same way as before in 8942.	View
5	Dots replaced by lines in 8942 and slurs placed on ii-iii and iv-vi.	View
6	Fingered 3 in 8942. Here David stays in 1st position until three bars later.	View
6	In 8942 turns are added after the trills.	View
6	Separate bows starting Π in 8942.	View
6	Π in 8942.	View
7	Not in 8942.	View
7	Not in 8942.	View
7	Not in 8942.	View
7	Turns to the trills in 8942.	View
7	Turns to the trills in 8942.	View
7	4 in 8942.	View
7	0 in 8942.	View
7	Π and no slur in 8942.	View
7	Π in 8942.	View
8	V in 8942.	View
8	Not in 8942.	View
8	3 in 8942.	View
8	Fingered 2 in 8942, with no 4 on the following note.	View
8	Not in 8942,	View
8	Fingered 4 1 in 8942, which was surely also intended here.	View
8	Fingered 1 3 in 8942	View
8	Lines (-) instead of dots in 8942.	View
9	Marked tr in 8942.	View
9	Both editions have the fingering that involves using the 2nd finger both for the appoggiatura and the main note, which would have been very untypical of the more modern school of fingering associated especially with Carl Flesch.	View
9	Fingered 1 in 8942.	View
9	There is no fingering here, indicating that the player was to remain in 1st position, but 3 is marked on the following appoggiatura and the 1 on g' is retained, preserving the shirt of a finger over a whole tone from f' to g'.	View
9	In 8942 the slurs here are extended by one note with the next slur beginning a note later and there are no staccato marks. Beethoven wrote the staccato notes detached from the slurs, which begin on the second note of the figure.	View
9	Fingered 4 in 8942.	View
9	8942 indicates a separate bow for the first note, which also has a horizontal line, and the c''' is fingered 3. The last note is marked V and fingered 4.	View
9	Fingered 2 in 8942.	View
9	8942 has a slur in the second bar (probably omitted in error here, since it occurs at the equivalent place later in the movement) and a fingering that indicates a deliberate portamento effect in both bars.	View
9	Fingered 4 in 8942.	View
9	Lines instead of dots under the slurs in 8942.	View
9	Fingered 3 in 8942.	View
9	Not in 8942.	View
9	Lines instead of dots and the slurring is the same in the second bar in 8942.	View
9	No 4 in 8942, but a 3 on the g', thus avoiding the portamento.	View
10	Although the use of the D-string is also marked in 8942, 3rd and 5th positions instead of 4th and 6th are indicated by the fingering.	View
10	Fingered 3 on the a♭'' and no fingering on the g'' in 8942.	View
10	The penultimate note of the first bar in 8942 is fingered 4 and the eighth note of the next bar 2. For slurring see the note at letter B on the previous page.	View
10	Fingered 3 in 8942.	View
10	Fingered 3 in 8942.	View
10	Here the espressivo seems to justify the portamento, but in 8942 it is avoided by the omission of the 3 and the addition of 1 on the b'.	View
10	No slurs in 8942.	View
10	Lines under the lurs in 8942.	View
10	Lines under the slurs in 8942.	View
10	All V in 8942.	View
11	This is a typical David fingering in which the 1st finger is used for three rapid semitones in succession. 8942 has it all on the E-string with a 2 on the first c''' followed by a 1 on the second c'''.	View
11	David probably intended the 1st finger to remain in position with extensions for the f''' and g'''. Here, as at the beginning of the Trio, 8942 changes the fingering to avoid the threefold use of the 3rd finger.	View
12	Lines under slurs in 8942.	View
12	Lines under the slurs in 8942.	View
12	In 8942 this staccato note is tied into the preceding up-bow slur.	View
12	All marked V and with horizontal lines in 8942.	View
12	Gingered 4 in 8942.	View
12	In 8942 there is a slur from the c''' to the b'' and no slurred staccato.	View
12	Not in 8942, which remains in 1st position until the a♭.	View
13	This is surely meant to be a fingering, though it is not in 8942, which remains in 1st position until the crotchet c' four bars later, where David again uses three 1st fingers in succession.	View
13	Fingered 1 in 8942.	View
13	FIngered 2 in 8942.	View
13	Both there and in 8942 1st position seems to be expected with a portamento to the c''.	View
13	Lines under slurs in 8942.	View
13	Lines instead of dots under the slurs in 8942.	View
13	Lines instead of dots under the slurs in 8942.	View
14	Lines under slurs in 8942.	View
14	Lines instead of dots under slurs in 8942.	View
14	8942 begins a new slur here.	View
14	Fingered 3 in 8942.	View
14	Fingered 2 in 8942.	View
14	Fingered 4 in 8942.	View
14	Fingered 0 2 in 8942.	View
14	2 evidently intended; it is made explicit in 8942.	View
14	Slurs not in 8942.	View